Lovelace 2013 (English)

Seeds: 137 Leechers: 66

Year: 2013 Genre: Biography, Drama Starring: Amanda Seyfried, James Franco, Peter Sarsgaard Director: Rob Epstein

Language: English
Runtime: 93 min
Subtitles: English
Resolution: 720x480
Frame Rate: 24 fps
Video Bitrate: 2924 Kb/sec
Audio Bitrate: 256 kbps

Torrent Size:	815 MB
Files:	3

Review: It quite surprising that fresh and healthy Amanda Seyfried has the role of the legendary '70s porn actress Linda Lovelace. Seyfried, who know how tion of income in musical films such as Mamma Mia and Les Miserables, as could pull this stunt daring? Lovelace tells how young and beautiful Linda Boreman, a strict Catholic family, unlikely met and married a guy named Chuck Traynor negligible. First, go wild with the idea of ​​Chuck to make a her a porn star, using some of her extraordinary talent that he would be the central theme of a little film called Deep Throat porn. I really enjoyed the success of this heady stardom as Linda Lovelace, for a while least.In a sudden change of pace, the second half of the film shows how Linda was abused by her husband, physically, mentally, sexually, financial. She still suffered this torture until he could not stand and fight more to get his old life back.The show Ms. Seyfried was very good, so she knew convince us that Linda was cast against type though . We will be your side before the movie ends. People who see this movie hoping that reveal more skin will be disappointed, as this Linda stayed pretty clean on the screen. The picture painted by Linda was actually quite nice as well like, like it was all the fault of Chuck. Ms. Seyfried played the perfect naive victim.Peter Sarsgaard was actually scary as Chuck from the beginning. You really can not understand how to Beautiful marry a guy like that. He could have portrayed to be more charming in the beginning to convince us. But he like a worm, even in the scene where he first encountered with the parents of Linda (portrayed by Robert Patrick and Sharon Stone totally unrecognizable.) I think the main problem with the film was in its narrative . It was a very strong and abrupt transformation glad Linda in Act 1 and 2 Pretty sad attention. I think the director was trying to be this stylistic, not having these details linearly, instead of going back and forth in time. I think it could be told in a more efficient differently.